Good morning!

 

Is it possible to check online if a Dutch company has/had lawsuits in courts? I've found only rechtspraak.nl. But I don't see there our ex-business partner despite he was involved in several lawsuits.

 

Thank you!

Hi Roberto

 

Court rulings usually don't include privacy related information. They are redacted as far as it concerns personal names or names of legal entities that relate to personal names. Names of non-legal persons are also redacted.

 

Best chance to find them is to look it up in Google. 

 

Do lawyers / solicitors have access to actual rulings, including business names or personal data?

  Op 9-10-2022 om 12:10, TwaBla zei:

 

Do lawyers / solicitors have access to actual rulings, including business names or personal data?

No, except for active cases and then only by name of the parties in the proceedings per court. So basically there's no easy way to even find active cases for a company. For closed cases, rechtspraak.nl is the most reliable source, but since only a small percentage of cases is published, you can't use rechtspraak.nl to determine if there've been cases.

  Quote

ex-business partner

This is new information for your other topic.

 

This is no matter of three strikes out or similar measures in criminal versus civil right.

 

Why are you not seeking any professional advice instead of getting free advice during the weekends?

 

I am afraid you're not taking or starting the right actions in this case as co-owner or director of a company.

 

BR,

 

Wigbolt

9 oktober 20222 j aangepast door Wigbolt

  Op 9-10-2022 om 13:49, StevenK zei:

No, except for active cases and then only by name of the parties in the proceedings per court.

• Court rulings are public (openbaar*), but only a selection is published.
• It would seem logical that all rulings are stored and made accessible to the court and probably also the parties involved.
• It seems odd that nobody (not even the huge legal databases) collects these data.
• Unless it is obstructed by the courts, based on some sort of logic.

  Op 9-10-2022 om 11:34, Joost Rietveld zei:

Names of non-legal persons are also redacted.

But not companies. 

 

If Roberto starts a case against his business partner / supplier, would his lawyer have access to previous cases involving the same company/persons?

9 oktober 20222 j aangepast door TwaBla

  Quote

business partner / supplier

Non-purchasing or paying customer (according to unsigned/oral volume agreement/contract)

BR,

 

Wigbolt

9 oktober 20222 j aangepast door Wigbolt

  Op 9-10-2022 om 15:07, TwaBla zei:

• Court rulings are public (openbaar*), but only a selection is published.
• It would seem logical that all rulings are stored and made accessible to the court and probably also the parties involved.

It would seem logical, but logic more often than not ignored in defining policies.

  Op 9-10-2022 om 15:07, TwaBla zei:

• It seems odd that nobody (not even the huge legal databases) collects these data.
• Unless it is obstructed by the courts, based on some sort of logic.

The data isn't available in a way that can be indexed. The obstruction is based on the limited availability of redactional capacity, which is required to remove any information that could enable one from identifying natural persons. 

  Op 9-10-2022 om 15:07, TwaBla zei:

But not companies. 

Unless the company's name contains a person's name. De Vries Transport BV will also be redacted..

  Op 9-10-2022 om 15:07, TwaBla zei:

 

If Roberto starts a case against his business partner / supplier, would his lawyer have access to previous cases involving the same company/persons?

No, he wouldn't. 

  Op 9-10-2022 om 13:50, Wigbolt zei:

This is new information for your other topic.

 

Why are you not seeking any professional advice instead of getting free advice during the weekends?

 

Yes, it's related. Each country has it's own local laws, so I've decided to research first to decide how to act. Asking lawyers having some country specific info is better than just asking without any prior knowledge)

This company was involved in some lawsuits before (this we know from their contractors), but there are no details. It's not about "three strikes out or similar measures in criminal versus civil right." - we just want to have some proofs that this company was doing some illegal activities in the past.

  Op 9-10-2022 om 15:25, Wigbolt zei:

according to unsigned/oral volume agreement/contract

We've made written agreements via emails, additionally we have a basic contract, which was signed in the beginning of our cooperation.

  Op 9-10-2022 om 18:24, StevenK zei:

No, he wouldn't. 

The same rules in Italy.

Illegal activities vs civil claim does not help you out...

 

...I repeat you´re running late taking first steps as a risk.

 

BR,

 

Wigbolt

12 oktober 20222 j aangepast door Wigbolt

  Op 12-10-2022 om 08:40, Wigbolt zei:

Illegal activities vs civil claim does not help you out...

Thanks, we are not going to use it in a court. It's for other purposes.